Attorney offers abbreviated examination of the pros and cons of gun control

J. Bradley Klepper
Attorney at Law

I am writing this article shortly after the April 15 FedEx shooting in which a gunman killed at least eight people before taking his own life. I am not sure why I feel the need to tell you all that, other than to let you know that it is fresh on my mind. I understand that the mere fact that the title of this article references guns is likely enough to guarantee I will receive a million comments.

With that in mind, let’s get a couple of things out of the way up front.

First, I am something of a Second Amendment guy. I like guns. I used to hunt quite a bit, but now I am old and not that fond of getting up early or sitting in a cold tree stand. Regardless, there is a gun range just around the corner from my office, and I will often sneak out at lunch and take out my aggression on paper targets that have wronged me in some way. This is how I get my fix.

However, even though I am a Second Amendment guy, I also think that background checks are a good thing and should probably be a bit stricter. I also think everyone who purchases a gun should have to take a class on gun safety, something similar to the class I took back when I got my concealed carry license. Based on the way I have seen people handle their firearms on the range, this class is really needed.

Now that the disclaimers are out of the way, what I really want to do is just put some of the pros and cons for gun control out there and let you decide.

At the end of the day, my ulterior motive is to — hopefully — allow folks to have a civil discussion about this issue. There are valid points on each side of the argument. Heaven knows a civil discussion about anything political would be a minor miracle.

Please note that due to space limitations, and the fact that I am fundamentally lazy, I have not listed all the research points and statistics associated with arguments on either side. So, without further ado, here are some (not all) of the pros of the gun control argument.

  • The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns;
  • More gun control laws would reduce deaths;
  • High-capacity magazines should be banned because they often turn murder into mass murder;
  • Gun control laws are needed to protect women from domestic abuse and stalkers;
  • Guns are rarely used in self-defense;
  • Gun control laws would reduce the societal costs associated with gun violence;
  • A majority of people support common-sense gun control laws such as background checks, bans on assault weapons and high capacity magazines; and
  • Gun control laws, such as mandatory safety features, would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths

On the other side of the coin, several arguments can be made against gun control. The con list includes the following:

  • The Second Amendment protects individual gun ownership;
  • Gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime;
  • Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety;
  • Assault weapon bans infringe upon the right to own guns for hunting and sport;
  • Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from getting guns;
  • Gun control laws give too much power to the government and may result in government tyranny;
  • Gun control laws such as background checks are an invasion of privacy; and
  • More gun control is not needed; education about safety and guns is needed to prevent accidental deaths.

As you can see there are serval arguments to be made, both pro and con, regarding gun control. Personally, I agree with some points on each side of the argument.

As I already mentioned, I am in favor of background checks (from the pro list), and I believe the answer to reducing accidental deaths is found in education (con list).

The one thing that I do know is that I am sick and tired of reading about mass shootings. Unfortunately, I do not have an answer for the problem. However, as previously noted, I do think the first step is for all of us to have a civil discussion about the issue. While we may not all agree, we can at least discuss it like adults.

Remember, as I have said before, just because I disagree with you does not mean I hate you. It just means I disagree with you.

Brad Klepper, Esq. is President of Interstate Trucker Ltd., a law firm entirely dedicated to legal defense of the nation's commercial drivers. Interstate Trucker represents truck drivers throughout the forty-eight (48) states on both moving and non-moving violations. Brad is also Executive Vice President & General Counsel of Drivers Legal Plan, which allows member drivers access to his firm’s services at greatly discounted rates. Brad spent almost a decade with the largest law firm in Oklahoma where his practice included extensive experience in transactional law, business defense litigation, and intellectual property. In addition, Brad is a licensed architect and serves as General Counsel to the Oklahoma Board of Architects, Landscape Architects and Interior Designers. Brad has dedicated much of his time to DataQs challenges, which are challenges posed to the FMCSA for CSA incidents, to examine data and reports filed by law enforcement.

800-333-DRIVE (3748) or and


Gun Control